Previous Topic: AFP Transformer PerformanceNext Topic: CA Spool Health Checker


SYSOUT Input Interface Selection

Use the appropriate interface when bringing SYSOUT files under CA Spool control. There are four different CA Spool SYSOUT input interfaces to choose from; one or a combination will be the best practice for your site. Use the guidance supplied in the Additional Considerations section to evaluate the impact of each interface and to determine the most productive and advantageous configuration.

Business Value:

CA Spool efficiency is directly related to the type of input interface(s) that you choose to implement. The methods by which CA Spool collects input data have a significant impact on processing speed and system resources.

Additional Considerations:

To gain the most control over when CA Spool processes reports, you can choose to have the SYSOUT written to JES first and then transferred to CA Spool using the NJE interface or the XFER SAPI interface.

If you want to avoid double spooling first in JES and then in CA Spool, you can use the DD SUBSYS interface or the SYSOUT Allocation Intercept interface. This requires CA Spool to be running on the system where the SYSOUT is generated.

The SYSOUT input interfaces, in order of best performance are:

When XFERSAPI=THREADS is used, a thread is established for each request designated by the ESFPARM definitions when the interface is initialized. The JES subsystem will post each thread when a SYSOUT is available that matches the selection criteria established when the thread was initialized. When XFERTIME expires, each thread is checked to determine if any new SYSOUT is available, and if so, a request is made to transfer that SYSOUT.