Previous Topic: IDCMFORE02 - Expected an alpha or numeric field in ORDERED BY <ID>, found group fieldNext Topic: IDCMFORE04 - Missing DVW identifier in ORDERED BY clause

Compile (CM) Messages › › IDCMFORE03 - "ORDERED" is not valid for FOR-constructs referencing Sequential DVWs

IDCMFORE03 - "ORDERED" is not valid for FOR-constructs referencing Sequential DVWs

Reason:

An ORDERED BY clause is not valid for sequential files.

Action:

Do not use an ORDERED BY clause in a FOR statement that uses a sequential dataview.