|
|
|
For this case study, we used the Tape Drive Simulation Analysis inquiry to determine peaks of daily tape drive usage, determine the effects of tape drive over-allocation on two critical jobs, and model the implementation of the movement of one of these jobs to a period of time when tape drives were available. Based on the results of the analysis, we planned an additional study detailing steps that allocated tape drives but did not transfer any tape data. The site in question used a shared pool of 32 3420 type devices. Two drives were 800/1600 BPI (bytes per inch) devices and the rest were 1600/6250 BPI. The vast majority of the tape work used tapes at 6250 BPI. A midweek IPL was usually scheduled Wednesday at midnight. Scheduled tape drive maintenance generally occurred during prime shift when tape drive and batch usage was low. JES2 was in effect with a purchased job scheduling system. Prime shift hours 8-18 were primarily devoted to CICS, TSO, and batch test work. Normally CICS was brought down at 20:00, at which time production batch work was heavily scheduled. The study was triggered by the failure to meet objectives in production work schedules for critical tape jobs. The initial reports were run over a period of several weeks to determine if tape drive over-allocation was the cause of delays, when the peaks of allocation fell, and if a consistent daily/hourly pattern was apparent. Figure 2-138 shows the control parameters we used for the last of these daily reports.
/---------------------- IOA Tape Drive Simulation Analysis ---------------------\ | Command ===> | | | | Composing CA MICS Inquiry: IOA57 - Tape Drive Analysis Case Study | | | | Time-span: DETAIL Cycle(s) ===> 01 - 01 | | Data base ===> A (PRIMARY) _ _ _ _ | | | | Include batch pgms ===> Y (Y/N) Include system tasks ===> N (Y/N) | | Include TSO users ===> N (Y/N) Merge SMF JOB info. ===> N (Y/N) | | Include APPC TPs ===> N (Y/N) | | | | Report date ===> 13NOVyy (ddmonyy) Report hours ===> 0 - 23 (hh) | | Report level ===> SUMMARY (SUMMARY/DETAIL) JES version ===> 2 (2/3) | | Anal. method ===> PRORATE (SNAPSHOT/PRORATE) Sampling intv. ===> 60 (min) | | Max. tapes ===> 30 (Blank or nn) | | Chart reference line and summary report limit for printing ===> 0 (000-999) | | | | Data Selection : | | Hour Selection ===> __ - __ (hh-hh) | | Sysid Selection ===> ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ | | | | Specify extended options ===> N (Y/N) | | | \-------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
Figure 2-138. Case Study - Tape Drive Simulation Analysis Inquiry Panel (Report 1)
The Tape Analysis Summary Chart and an extract of the report for hour 23 is provided in Figure 2-146. The pattern displayed in the chart is typical of those days when failures to meet scheduling deadlines were reported. Relatively high step allocation times in hour 23 were typical. Two of the jobs that were listed as critical production work, CNSPD032 and UCC7LOGS, displayed extremely high allocation delay times and relatively high (2) drive demands. System and job output for these two jobs confirmed that the allocation delays were the result of tape drive demands. Hours 3-8 consistently showed low tape drive usage periods, as did prime shift and other periods when CICS was active. The summary reports also showed a large number of job steps that were extremely short in duration allocating tape drives. This type of work displayed zero drives prorated in the summary report due to the length of the interval (1 hour or 3600 seconds) and the very short durations of the steps (less than 18 seconds). (The report display length for the prorated number of drives is limited to two decimal positions, thus these values were displayed as zero.) It appeared that these job steps either conditionally required tape drives, or were using tape when DASD would have been more efficient. Investigation of the JCL of a few of these jobs revealed that in many cases the JCL was structured to ensure at job start that allocation delays would not be experienced by subsequent steps requiring a drive. In other words, unneeded tape drive allocations were implemented by previous steps. In effect, tape drive reservation was being implemented manually through the JCL. We concluded that a separate study of these steps must be conducted and that, in the future, allocations of this type must be regarded as a standards violation in production JCL. Obviously, the movement of work from the tape-constrained period shown in the peak of hours 22 and 23 to a less utilized period would cause the allocation delays experienced by work in hour 23 to decrease and shorten the durations of both CNSPD032 and UCC7LOGS. The scheduling requirements for both jobs were analyzed. The only requirement for CNSPD032 was completion by 8:00; UCC7LOGS, however, could not be moved. Hours 3 through 6 appeared to be a good candidate for the movement of CNSPD032. Figure 2-139 shows the entries we made in the inquiry fields to analyze these hours in detail to determine the best starting point for CNSPD032. An extract of the charts showing hour 3 is shown in Figure 2-147. The reports for this time frame are not shown. The charts and reports for hours 4-6 showed results very similar to hour 3 after 3:24:00, in that no time period exceeded 10 drives.
/---------------------- IOA Tape Drive Simulation Analysis ---------------------\ | Command ===> | | | | Composing CA MICS Inquiry: IOA58 - Tape Drive Analysis Case Study | | | | Time-span: DETAIL Cycle(s) ===> 01 - 01 | | Data base ===> A (PRIMARY) _ _ _ _ | | | | Include batch pgms ===> Y (Y/N) Include system tasks ===> N (Y/N) | | Include TSO users ===> N (Y/N) Merge SMF JOB info. ===> N (Y/N) | | Include APPC TPs ===> N (Y/N) | | | | Report date ===> 13NOVyy (ddmonyy) Report hours ===> 3 - 6 (hh) | | Report level ===> DETAIL (SUMMARY/DETAIL) JES version ===> 2 (2/3) | | Anal. method ===> SNAPSHOT (SNAPSHOT/PRORATE) Sampling intv. ===> 2 (min) | | Max. tapes ===> 30 (Blank or nn) | | Chart reference line and summary report limit for printing ===> 26 (000-999) | | | | Data Selection : | | Hour Selection ===> 03 - 06 (hh-hh) | | Sysid Selection ===> ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ | | | | Specify extended options ===> N (Y/N) | | | \-------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
Figure 2-139. Case Study - Tape Drive Simulation Analysis Inquiry Panel (Report 2)
Based on this output, we decided to run two more inquiries to model the movement of CNSPD032 to 3:24:00 and to model effects of reduced allocation times for both jobs. The inquiry fields for each run are shown in Figures 2-140 through 2-193 and 2-194 through 2-196.
/---------------------- IOA Tape Drive Simulation Analysis ---------------------\ | Command ===> | | | | Composing CA MICS Inquiry: IOA59 - Tape Drive Analysis Case Study | | | | Time-span: DETAIL Cycle(s) ===> 01 - 01 | | Data base ===> A (PRIMARY) _ _ _ _ | | | | Include batch pgms ===> Y (Y/N) Include system tasks ===> N (Y/N) | | Include TSO users ===> N (Y/N) Merge SMF JOB info. ===> N (Y/N) | | Include APPC TPs ===> N (Y/N) | | | | Report date ===> 13NOVyy (ddmmmyy) Report hours ===> 22 - 23 (hh) | | Report level ===> SUMMARY (SUMMARY/DETAIL) JES version ===> 2 (2/3) | | Anal. method ===> SNAPSHOT (SNAPSHOT/PRORATE) Sampling intv. ===> 2 (min) | | Max. tapes ===> 30 (Blank or nn) | | Chart reference line and summary report limit for printing ===> 26 (000-999) | | | | Data Selection : | | Hour Selection ===> 22 - 23 (hh-hh) | | Sysid Selection ===> ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ | | | | Specify extended options ===> Y (Y/N) | | | \-------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
Figure 2-140. Case Study - Tape Drive Simulation Analysis Inquiry Panel (Report 3)
Because we coded Y (Yes) in the Specify extended options field, the Extended Options Menu was displayed, which enabled us to chose the Specify USER modeling exit and Move workload observations options.
/-------------------------------- SAS Statements -------------------------------\ | Command ===> Scroll ===> CSR | | | | Inquiry Step: IOA Tape Drive Simulation Analysis | | | | Line Cmds: I Insert D Delete R Repeat M Move C Copy | | | | Cmd SAS Statements for: Specifying USER exit | | - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | _ - %MACRO PERUSEL; | | _ - IF JOB = 'UCC7LOGS' OR JOB = 'CNSPD032' THEN DO; | | _ - ENDTS=ENDTS-PGMALCTM; | | _ - END; | | _ - %MEND PERUSEL; | | ****************************** BOTTOM OF DATA ******************************** | | | | | | | | | | | \-------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
Figure 2-141. Case Study - User Modeling Exit (Report 3)
/-------------------------- Move Workload Observations -------------------------\ | Command ===> Scroll ===> CSR | | | | Inquiry Step: IOA Tape Drive Simulation Analysis | | Report date: 13NOVyy Report hours: 22 - 23 | | | | Line Cmds: I Insert D Delete C Copy M Move R Reset | | | | Old Start Time New Start Time | | Cmd Jobname (hh : mm : ss . th (hh : mm : ss . th) | | - -------- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- | | _ CNSPD032 21 : 04 : 48 . 43 03 : 24 : 00 . 00 | | ****************************** BOTTOM OF DATA ******************************** | | | | | | | | | | | | | \-------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
Figure 2-142. Case Study - Move Workload Observations (Report 3)
/---------------------- IOA Tape Drive Simulation Analysis ---------------------\ | Command ===> | | | | Composing CA MICS Inquiry: IOA62 - Tape Drive Analysis Case Study | | | | Time-span: DETAIL Cycle(s) ===> 01 - 01 | | Data base ===> A (PRIMARY) _ _ _ _ | | | | Include batch pgms ===> Y (Y/N) Include system tasks ===> N (Y/N) | | Include TSO users ===> N (Y/N) Merge SMF JOB info. ===> N (Y/N) | | | | Report date ===> 13NOVyy (ddmonyy) Report hours ===> 03 - 06 (hh) | | Report level ===> SUMMARY (SUMMARY/DETAIL) JES version ===> 2 (2/3) | | Anal. method ===> SNAPSHOT (SNAPSHOT/PRORATE) Sampling intv. ===> 1 (min) | | Max. tapes ===> 30 (Blank or nn) | | Chart reference line and summary report limit for printing ===> 0 (000-999) | | | | Data Selection : | | Hour Selection ===> 03 - 06 (hh-hh) | | Sysid Selection ===> ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ | | | | Specify extended options ===> Y (Y/N) | | | \-------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
Figure 2-143. Case Study - Tape Drive Simulation Analysis Inquiry Panel (Report 4)
/-------------------------------- SAS Statements -------------------------------\ | Command ===> Scroll ===> CSR | | | | Inquiry Step: IOA Tape Drive Simulation Analysis | | | | Line Cmds: I Insert D Delete R Repeat M Move C Copy | | | | Cmd SAS Statements for: Specifying USER exit | | - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | _ - %MACRO PERUSEL; | | _ - IF JOB = 'UCC7LOGS' OR JOB = 'CNSPD032' THEN DO; | | _ - ENDTS=ENDTS-PGMALCTM; | | _ - END; | | _ - %MEND PERUSEL; | | ****************************** BOTTOM OF DATA ******************************** | | | | | | | | | \-------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
Figure 2-144. Case Study - User Modeling Exit (Report 4)
/-------------------------- Move Workload Observations -------------------------\ | Command ===> Scroll ===> CSR | | | | Inquiry Step: IOA Tape Drive Simulation Analysis | | Report date: 13NOVyy Report hours: 03 - 06 | | | | Line Cmds: I Insert D Delete C Copy M Move R Reset | | | | Old Start Time New Start Time | | Cmd Jobname (hh : mm : ss . th (hh : mm : ss . th) | | - -------- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- | | _ CNSPD032 21 : 04 : 48 . 43 03 : 24 : 00 . 00 | | ****************************** BOTTOM OF DATA ******************************** | | | \-------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
Figure 2-145. Case Study - Move Workload Observation (Report 4)
Extracts from the charts for hours 22 and 23 are shown in Figure 2-148. As the summary report was requested with a Drive Limit of 26 and the UCC7LOGS job was modified to reduce its execution by 30:00.70 (the allocation time) in the USER exit macro, the step now ends at 22:45:23.33. Thus, the Drive Limit value was not exceeded during the time periods of the job's execution, and the job is not displayed on the report. Figure 2-149 displays extracts from the charts and reports for hour 3 showing the effect of the movement of CNSPD032.
CA MICS Performance Manager TAPE DRIVE ANALYSIS SUMMARY CHART TAPE ALLOCATION DURING ANALYSIS PERIOD STEP ALLOCATION PRORATED ANALYSIS - PRORATING METHOD USED - MACROS ACTIVE - DATE ANALYZED=13NOVyy BAR CHART OF PROTAPE TESTTM TIME ANALYZED | 0:00:00 |CCCCCCCC 1:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 2:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 4:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 5:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 6:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 7:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 8:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 9:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 10:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 11:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 12:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 13:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 14:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 15:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 16:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 17:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 18:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 19:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 20:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 21:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 22:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 23:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC ----+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 MVS TAPE DRIVES PRORATED SYMBOL SYM C CURRENT WORKLOAD
Figure 2-146. Case Study - Report 1 - Summary Prorate Chart/Report Extract (Part 1 of 3)
CA MICS Performance Manager TAPE DRIVE ANALYSIS SUMMARY EXCEPTION REPORT TAPE WORKLOADS RUNNING DURING TAPE-CONSTRAINED PERIODS STEP ALLOCATION ANALYSIS - PRORATING METHOD USED - MACROS ACTIVE - --------------------------------------------DATE ANALYZED=13NOVyy TIME ANALYZED=23:00:00----------------------------------------- JOB READER STEP PROGRAM START ID TIME NBR NAME TIME STAMP STAMP ASBNKBUP 13NOVyy:23:17:49.84 1 IKCGENER 13NOVyy:23:17:56.90 ASBNKBUP 13NOVyy:23:17:49.84 2 IKCGENER 13NOVyy:23:19:49.27 ASBNKBUP 13NOVyy:23:17:49.84 3 IKCGENER 13NOVyy:23:19:55.31 BAK10SDI 13NOVyy:23:46:07.61 3 BARBS102 13NOVyy:23:47:33.91 BEJBKTP 13NOVyy:22:01:02.58 2 IDCAMS 13NOVyy:22:37:47.26 BEJBKTP 13NOVyy:22:01:02.58 3 IDCAMS 13NOVyy:23:10:13.97 BEJBKTP 13NOVyy:22:01:02.58 4 IDCAMS 13NOVyy:23:46:37.59 CCYREPR1 13NOVyy:20:05:45.75 2 IDCAMS 13NOVyy:23:44:16.56 CCYREPR2 13NOVyy:20:05:46.05 2 IDCAMS 13NOVyy:23:43:46.80 CHMTTBKP 13NOVyy:23:16:24.14 5 IKCGENER 13NOVyy:23:50:33.09 CICSCMF1 13NOVyy:23:14:09.79 1 IEBGENER 13NOVyy:23:14:40.15 CICSCMF1 13NOVyy:23:14:09.79 2 IEBGENER 13NOVyy:23:49:06.01 CICSCMF2 13NOVyy:23:14:09.89 1 IEBGENER 13NOVyy:23:14:30.19 CICSCMF2 13NOVyy:23:14:09.89 2 IEBGENER 13NOVyy:23:55:00.15 CICSCMF3 13NOVyy:23:14:09.98 1 IEBGENER 13NOVyy:23:14:30.18 CICSCMF3 13NOVyy:23:14:09.98 2 IEBGENER 13NOVyy:23:42:36.29 CICSCMF3 13NOVyy:23:14:09.98 3 IEBGENER 13NOVyy:23:55:40.17 CICSPK1X 13NOVyy:04:04:49.38 7 DFHSIP 13NOVyy:04:05:57.85 CNSPDO32 13NOVyy:21:04:48.43 1 CNSPD030 13NOVyy:21:12:25.08 UCC7LOGS 13NOVyy:22:33:34.55 2 SASSHIS5 13NOVyy:22:39:59.16 -------- TESTTM TESTDATE
Figure 2-146. Case Study - Report 1 - Summary Prorate Chart/Report Extract (Part 2 of 3)
CA MICS Performance Manager TAPE DRIVE ANALYSIS SUMMARY EXCEPTION REPORT TAPE WORKLOADS RUNNING DURING TAPE-CONSTRAINED PERIODS STEP ALLOCATION ANALYSIS - PRORATING METHOD USED - MACROS ACTIVE - --------------------------------------------DATE ANALYZED=13NOVyy TIME ANALYZED=23:00:00----------------------------------------- JOB END SYS STEP ADDED TAPE MVS TAPE ID TIME ID ALLOC. OR DEVICES DRIVES STAMP TIME MOVED ALLOC. PRORATED ASBNKBUP 13NOVyy:23:19:49.20 SYSE 0:00:58.02 CURRENT 1.00 0.03 ASBNKBUP 13NOVyy:23:19:55.25 SYSE 0:00:01.70 CURRENT 1.00 0.00 ASBNKBUP 13NOVyy:23:19:59.02 SYSE 0:00:01.45 CURRENT 1.00 0.00 BAK10SDI 13NOVyy:23:50:46.07 SYSE 0:00:01.83 CURRENT 1.00 0.05 BEJBKTP 13NOVyy:23:10:13.90 SYSE 0:00:01.92 CURRENT 1.00 0.17 BEJBKTP 13NOVyy:23:46:37.51 SYSE 0:08:41.76 CURRENT 1.00 0.61 BEJBKTP 13NOVyy:23:49:45.12 SYSE 0:00:01.67 CURRENT 1.00 0.05 CCYREPR1 14NOVyy:00:03:26.44 SYSC 0:00:02.28 CURRENT 1.00 0.26 CCYREPR2 14NOVyy:00:15:59.32 SYSC 0:00:02.71 CURRENT 1.00 0.27 CHMTTBKP 13NOVyy:23:56:40.29 SYSE 0:01:06.87 CURRENT 1.00 0.10 CICSCMF1 13NOVyy:23:49:05.92 SYSA 0:04:22.41 CURRENT 1.00 0.57 CICSCMF1 14NOVyy:00:06:37.69 SYSA 0:07:43.69 CURRENT 1.00 0.18 CICSCMF2 13NOVyy:23:55:00.07 SYSE 0:04:25.18 CURRENT 1.00 0.67 CICSCMF2 14NOVyy:00:05:40.41 SYSE 0:05:07.72 CURRENT 1.00 0.08 CICSCMF3 13NOVyy:23:42:36.22 SYSE 0:04:25.18 CURRENT 1.00 0.47 CICSCMF3 13NOVyy:23:55:40.10 SYSE 0:00:02.44 CURRENT 1.00 0.22 CICSCMF3 14NOVyy:00:02:14.23 SYSE 0:03:12.07 CURRENT 1.00 0.07 CICSPK1X 13NOVyy:23:03:18.56 SYSB 0:00:48.49 CURRENT 1.00 0.05 CNSPDO32 13NOVyy:23:15:24.03 SYSE 0:30:00.70 CURRENT 2.00 0.51 UCC7LOGS 13NOVyy:23:34:37.95 SYSC 0:33:52.66 CURRENT 2.00 1.15 -------- ------- ------- TESTTM 224.00 25.04 TESTDATE 1356.00 199.19 ======= ======= 1356.00 199.19
Figure 2-146. Case Study - Report 1 - Summary Prorate Chart/Report Extract (Part 3 of 3)
CA MICS Performance Manager TAPE DRIVE ANALYSIS DETAIL WORKLOAD CHART TAPE ALLOCATION BY TYPES OF WORK RUNNING DURING THE ANALYSIS PERIOD STEP ALLOCATION ANALYSIS - SNAPSHOT METHOD USED - MACROS ACTIVE - DATE ANALYZED=13NOVyy HOUR OF DAY=3 BAR CHART OF SUMS TESTTM TIME ANALYZED | 3:00:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBSSSS | 3:02:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBSSSS | 3:04:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBSSSS | 3:06:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBSSSS | 3:08:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBSSSS | 3:10:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:12:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:14:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:16:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:18:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:20:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:22:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:24:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:26:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:28:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:30:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:32:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:34:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:36:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:38:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:40:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:42:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:44:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:46:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:48:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:50:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:52:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:54:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:56:00 |BBBBBBBBBBBB | 3:58:00 |BBBBBBBB | ----+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 TAPE DEVICES ALLOC. SYMBOL WRKLOAD SYMBOL WRKLOAD B BATCH WORKLOAD S STARTED TASKS
Figure 2-147. Case Study - Report 2 - Detail Snapshot Chart Extract
CA MICS Performance Manager TAPE DRIVE ANALYSIS SUMMARY CHART TAPE ALLOCATION DURING ANALYSIS PERIOD STEP ALLOCATION MODEL - SNAPSHOT METHOD USED - WORK MOVED - MACROS ACTIVE - DATE ANALYZED=13NOVyy HOUR ANALYZED=22 BAR CHART OF PGMMXNTA TESTTM TIME ANALYZED | 22:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:02:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:04:00 |CCCCCCCC | 22:06:00 |CCCCCCCC | 22:08:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:10:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:12:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:14:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:16:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:18:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:20:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:22:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:24:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:26:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:28:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:30:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:32:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:34:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:36:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:38:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:40:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:42:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:44:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:46:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:48:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:50:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:52:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:54:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:56:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 22:58:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | ----+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 TAPE DEVICES ALLOC. SYMBOL SYM C CURRENT WORKLOAD
Figure 2-148. Case Study - Report 3 - Summary Snapshot Chart (Part 1 of 2)
CA MICS Performance Manager TAPE DRIVE ANALYSIS SUMMARY CHART TAPE ALLOCATION DURING ANALYSIS PERIOD STEP ALLOCATION MODEL - SNAPSHOT METHOD USED - WORK MOVED - MACROS ACTIVE - DATE ANALYZED=13NOVyy HOUR ANALYZED=23 BAR CHART OF PGMMXNTA TESTTM TIME ANALYZED | 23:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:02:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:04:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:06:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:08:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:10:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 23:12:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 23:14:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 23:16:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 23:18:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 23:20:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:22:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:24:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:26:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:28:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:30:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:32:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:34:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:36:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:38:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:40:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:42:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:44:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:46:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:48:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:50:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:52:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:54:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:56:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | 23:58:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC | ----+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+-- 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 TAPE DEVICES ALLOC. SYMBOL SYM C CURRENT WORKLOAD
Figure 2-148. Case Study - Report 3 - Summary Snapshot Chart (Part 2 of 2)
CA MICS Performance Manager TAPE DRIVE ANALYSIS SUMMARY CHART TAPE ALLOCATION DURING ANALYSIS PERIOD STEP ALLOCATION MODEL - SNAPSHOT METHOD USED - WORK MOVED - MACROS ACTIVE - DATE ANALYZED=13NOVyy HOUR ANALYZED=3 BAR CHART OF SUMS TESTTM TIME ANALYZED | 3:00:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:01:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:02:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:03:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:04:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:05:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:06:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:07:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:08:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:09:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:10:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:11:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:12:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:13:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:14:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:15:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:16:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:17:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:18:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:19:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:20:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:21:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:22:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:23:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:24:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:25:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:26:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:27:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:28:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:29:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Figure 2-149. Case Study - Report 4 - Summary Snapshot Chart/Report (Part 1 of 3)
CA MICS Performance Manager TAPE DRIVE ANALYSIS SUMMARY CHART TAPE ALLOCATION DURING ANALYSIS PERIOD STEP ALLOCATION MODEL - SNAPSHOT METHOD USED - WORK MOVED - MACROS ACTIVE - DATE ANALYZED=13NOVyy HOUR ANALYZED=3 BAR CHART OF SUMS TESTTM TIME ANALYZED 3:30:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:31:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 3:32:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:33:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:34:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:35:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:36:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:37:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:38:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:39:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:40:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:41:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:42:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:43:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:44:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:45:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:46:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:47:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:48:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:49:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:50:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:51:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:52:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:53:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:54:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:55:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:56:00 |CCCCCCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:57:00 |CCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:58:00 |CCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM 3:59:00 |CCCCCCCCMMMMMMMM ----+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Figure 2-149. Case Study - Report 4 - Summary Snapshot Chart/Report (Part 2 of 3)
CA MICS Performance Manager TAPE DRIVE ANALYSIS SUMMARY EXCEPTION REPORT TAPE WORKLOADS RUNNING DURING TAPE-CONSTRAINED PERIODS STEP ALLOCATION MODEL - SNAPSHOT METHOD USED - WORK MOVED - MACROS ACTIVE - --------------------------------------------DATE ANALYZED=13NOVyy TIME ANALYZED=3:35:00------------------------------------------ JOB READER STEP PROGRAM START END SYS STEP ADDED TAPE ID TIME NBR NAME TIME TIME ID ALLOC. OR DEVICES STAMP STAMP STAMP TIME MOVED ALLOC. CHPTKRT2 13NOVyy:03:19:57.30 4 CHPTKIT2 13NOVyy:03:32:59.82 13NOVyy:03:41:05.85 SYSE 0:00:16.01 CURRENT 2.00 CHPUHSTD 13NOVyy:03:05:44.36 1 CHPUHST2 13NOVyy:03:05:45.00 13NOVyy:03:41:25.40 SYSC 0:00:11.94 CURRENT 1.00 CUPSWED 13NOVyy:01:41:10.55 2 CHPCUPS2 13NOVyy:01:43:18.69 13NOVyy:04:11:16.03 SYSC 0:00:33.08 CURRENT 1.00 HRM1000B 13NOVyy:03:19:48.89 2 PAY030 13NOVyy:03:19:56.56 13NOVyy:03:48:08.99 SYSB 0:00:05.04 CURRENT 1.00 MICODALY 13NOVyy:00:41:02.05 2 SAS 13NOVyy:00:45:46.41 13NOVyy:04:12:40.21 SYSC 0:00:19.29 CURRENT 1.00 TRSDTCU2 13NOVyy:02:42:53.02 5 TRSUCAS2 13NOVyy:02:49:40.80 13NOVyy:03:36:41.54 SYSB 0:00:30.13 CURRENT 1.00 CNSPDO32 13NOVyy:03:24:00.00 1 CNSPM030 13NOVyy:03:31:36.65 13NOVyy:05:04:34.90 SYSE 0:30:00.70 MOVED 2.00 -------- ------- TESTTM 9.00 --------------------------------------------DATE ANALYZED=13NOVyy TIME ANALYZED=3:36:00------------------------------------------ JOB READER STEP PROGRAM START END SYS STEP ADDED TAPE ID TIME NBR NAME TIME TIME ID ALLOC. OR DEVICES STAMP STAMP STAMP TIME MOVED ALLOC. CHPTKRT2 13NOVyy:03:19:57.30 4 CHPTKIT2 13NOVyy:03:32:59.82 13NOVyy:03:41:05.85 SYSE 0:00:16.01 CURRENT 2.00 CHPUHSTD 13NOVyy:03:05:44.36 1 CHPUHST2 13NOVyy:03:05:45.00 13NOVyy:03:41:25.40 SYSC 0:00:11.94 CURRENT 1.00 CUPSWED 13NOVyy:01:41:10.55 2 CHPCUPS2 13NOVyy:01:43:18.69 13NOVyy:04:11:16.03 SYSC 0:00:33.08 CURRENT 1.00 HRM1000B 13NOVyy:03:19:48.89 2 PAY030 13NOVyy:03:19:56.56 13NOVyy:03:48:08.99 SYSB 0:00:05.04 CURRENT 1.00 MICODALY 13NOVyy:00:41:02.05 2 SAS 13NOVyy:00:45:46.41 13NOVyy:04:12:40.21 SYSC 0:00:19.29 CURRENT 1.00 TRSDTCU2 13NOVyy:02:42:53.02 5 TRSUCAS2 13NOVyy:02:49:40.80 13NOVyy:03:36:41.54 SYSB 0:00:30.13 CURRENT 1.00 CNSPDO32 13NOVyy:03:24:00.00 1 CNSPM030 13NOVyy:03:31:36.65 13NOVyy:05:04:34.90 SYSE 0:30:00.70 MOVED 2.00 -------- ------- TESTTM 9.00 --------------------------------------------DATE ANALYZED=13NOVyy TIME ANALYZED=3:37:00------------------------------------------ JOB READER STEP PROGRAM START END SYS STEP ADDED TAPE ID TIME NBR NAME TIME TIME ID ALLOC. OR DEVICES STAMP STAMP STAMP TIME MOVED ALLOC. CHPTKRT2 13NOVyy:03:19:57.30 4 CHPTKIT2 13NOVyy:03:32:59.82 13NOVyy:03:41:05.85 SYSE 0:00:16.01 CURRENT 2.00 CHPUHSTD 13NOVyy:03:05:44.36 1 CHPUHST2 13NOVyy:03:05:45.00 13NOVyy:03:41:25.40 SYSC 0:00:11.94 CURRENT 1.00 CUPSWED 13NOVyy:01:41:10.55 2 CHPCUPS2 13NOVyy:01:43:18.69 13NOVyy:04:11:16.03 SYSC 0:00:33.08 CURRENT 1.00 HRM1000B 13NOVyy:03:19:48.89 2 PAY030 13NOVyy:03:19:56.56 13NOVyy:03:48:08.99 SYSB 0:00:05.04 CURRENT 1.00 MICODALY 13NOVyy:00:41:02.05 2 SAS 13NOVyy:00:45:46.41 13NOVyy:04:12:40.21 SYSC 0:00:19.29 CURRENT 1.00 TRSDTCU2 13NOVyy:02:42:53.02 9 IEBGENER 13NOVyy:03:36:45.21 13NOVyy:03:39:00.58 SYSB 0:00:02.71 CURRENT 1.00 CNSPDO32 13NOVyy:03:24:00.00 1 CNSPM030 13NOVyy:03:31:36.65 13NOVyy:05:04:34.90 SYSE 0:30:00.70 MOVED 2.00 -------- ------- TESTTM 9.00
Figure 2-149. Case Study - Report 4 - Summary Snapshot Chart/Report (Part 3 of 3)
| Copyright © 2012 CA. All rights reserved. | Tell Technical Publications how we can improve this information |